All stories
Non-TechFood / Ice Cream

How Ben & Jerry's Proved Values-Driven Business Could Outperform Conventional Wisdom

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield were told that mixing social activism with ice cream would kill their business. They used six thinking hats to navigate the tension between purpose and profit — and created one of the most beloved brands in food.

Company: Ben & Jerry's|Founded by: Ben Cohen & Jerry Greenfield

The Challenge

In the 1980s, business wisdom was clear: companies should focus on shareholder value, period. Social activism was for nonprofits. Mixing the two was seen as naive at best, destructive at worst.

Ben & Jerry's wanted to prove that a company could be profitable AND socially responsible — paying fair wages, sourcing ethically, supporting social causes, and donating 7.5% of pre-tax profits. Critics (including their own board) said this would make them uncompetitive against efficient, profit-maximizing competitors like Häagen-Dazs.

The Approach — Tools in Action

Six Thinking Hats helped navigate the tension between values and business:
  • White Hat (facts): Premium ice cream is a high-margin business. Consumers increasingly care about brand values. B&J's social positioning generates free media coverage.
  • Red Hat (emotions): Founders genuinely cared about social issues. Employees were passionate about the mission. Customers felt good buying the product.
  • Black Hat (risks): Higher costs from ethical sourcing. Some consumers don't care about values. Could alienate moderate customers with political stances.
  • Yellow Hat (benefits): Brand differentiation in a crowded market. Employee loyalty reduces turnover. Media coverage replaces advertising spend.
  • Green Hat (creativity): Name flavors after social causes (Cherry Garcia, Americone Dream). Use packaging as a platform for messaging. Create the "1% for Peace" campaign.
Radical Candor shaped the company culture: Ben and Jerry were personally invested in every employee while maintaining high standards. They cared personally AND challenged directly — the definition of radical candor. Conflict Resolution Diagram resolved the apparent profit-vs-purpose conflict: the shared objective was "build a sustainable, growing ice cream company." The assumption that profit and purpose were incompatible was wrong — they were actually reinforcing.

The Outcome

Ben & Jerry's proved that values-driven business could succeed:

  • Grew to $500M+ in annual revenue before acquisition by Unilever for $326M in 2000
  • Maintained social mission even after acquisition (uniquely, B&J's has an independent board that protects its social mission)
  • Became one of the most recognized ice cream brands globally
  • Pioneered the concept of "B Corporation" certification and stakeholder capitalism
  • Inspired thousands of businesses to integrate social purpose with profit

The critics were wrong: values didn't hurt the business — they WERE the business. The brand's social identity was inseparable from its commercial success.

💡

Key Takeaway

The assumption that profit and purpose conflict is often wrong. Use Six Thinking Hats to explore the tension from every angle — you may find that what seems like a trade-off is actually a reinforcing cycle.

Tools Used in This Story

Related Combos

Sources