The Challenge
In the 1980s, business wisdom was clear: companies should focus on shareholder value, period. Social activism was for nonprofits. Mixing the two was seen as naive at best, destructive at worst.
Ben & Jerry's wanted to prove that a company could be profitable AND socially responsible — paying fair wages, sourcing ethically, supporting social causes, and donating 7.5% of pre-tax profits. Critics (including their own board) said this would make them uncompetitive against efficient, profit-maximizing competitors like Häagen-Dazs.
The Approach — Tools in Action
- White Hat (facts): Premium ice cream is a high-margin business. Consumers increasingly care about brand values. B&J's social positioning generates free media coverage.
- Red Hat (emotions): Founders genuinely cared about social issues. Employees were passionate about the mission. Customers felt good buying the product.
- Black Hat (risks): Higher costs from ethical sourcing. Some consumers don't care about values. Could alienate moderate customers with political stances.
- Yellow Hat (benefits): Brand differentiation in a crowded market. Employee loyalty reduces turnover. Media coverage replaces advertising spend.
- Green Hat (creativity): Name flavors after social causes (Cherry Garcia, Americone Dream). Use packaging as a platform for messaging. Create the "1% for Peace" campaign.
The Outcome
Ben & Jerry's proved that values-driven business could succeed:
- Grew to $500M+ in annual revenue before acquisition by Unilever for $326M in 2000
- Maintained social mission even after acquisition (uniquely, B&J's has an independent board that protects its social mission)
- Became one of the most recognized ice cream brands globally
- Pioneered the concept of "B Corporation" certification and stakeholder capitalism
- Inspired thousands of businesses to integrate social purpose with profit
The critics were wrong: values didn't hurt the business — they WERE the business. The brand's social identity was inseparable from its commercial success.
Key Takeaway
The assumption that profit and purpose conflict is often wrong. Use Six Thinking Hats to explore the tension from every angle — you may find that what seems like a trade-off is actually a reinforcing cycle.
Tools Used in This Story
Six Thinking Hats
Decision MakingLook at a decision from different perspectives
Radical Candor
CommunicationGive feedback that is both caring and direct
Conflict Resolution Diagram
Problem SolvingFind win-win solutions to conflicts and dilemmas