All stories
Cautionary TaleRetail

How Sears Went from the Amazon of 1900 to Bankruptcy in 2018

Sears was the original "everything store" — they sold houses through the mail, had the largest catalog business, and were the biggest retailer in the world. They had every advantage Amazon later exploited. But they failed to see the evolution of their own market.

Company: Sears|Founded by: Richard Warren Sears (original)

The Challenge

In 1900, Sears was essentially what Amazon is today: an everything store that delivered to your door via catalog. By the 1970s, they were the largest retailer in America, with the tallest building in the world (Sears Tower) as their headquarters.

But retail was evolving. Walmart was growing with everyday low prices. Specialized retailers (Home Depot, Best Buy) were taking categories. And eventually, e-commerce would arrive — a channel Sears was uniquely positioned to dominate, given their 100+ year history in mail-order.

The Approach — Tools in Action

What went wrong — No Wardley Mapping of market evolution:

If Sears had used Wardley Mapping in the 1990s, they would have seen:

  • Physical retail: Evolving from product → commodity (margins compressing)
  • Catalog/mail-order: Their core competency, but being made obsolete by internet
  • E-commerce: Genesis → rapidly evolving toward product stage
  • Logistics and fulfillment: Sears had one of the best in the country (they literally shipped houses)

The strategic move was obvious: transition from catalog to e-commerce, leveraging their existing logistics, brand, and customer base. They were better positioned than Amazon to win e-commerce in the late 1990s.

What they also needed — Second-order Thinking:
  • First order: "E-commerce is a small fraction of retail. Our stores are fine."
  • Second order: "E-commerce is growing 30% per year. In 10 years, it will be a major channel."
  • Third order: "The company that wins e-commerce will have better data on customers, enabling even better retail."
  • Fourth order: "Physical retail without e-commerce will become a disadvantage, not an advantage."

Sears had the logistics network, the brand recognition, the customer data (from 100 years of catalog sales), and the financial resources. They had everything — except the willingness to see where their market was heading.

The Iceberg Model would have revealed the deeper issue:
  • Events: Declining same-store sales
  • Patterns: Customers shifting to specialized retailers and online
  • Structures: Leadership focused on real estate and financial engineering
  • Mental model: "We are a department store company" rather than "We are a customer fulfillment company"

The Outcome

Sears's decline was slow but total:

  • Revenue peaked at $53 billion (2006) and declined steadily
  • Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2018
  • Closed nearly all 3,500 stores (from a peak of 3,500+ down to a handful)
  • The Sears Tower was renamed Willis Tower in 2009
  • Meanwhile, Amazon — doing what Sears could have done — grew to $600B+ revenue and a $2T market cap
The parallel is almost painful: Sears shipped products to every home in America for 100 years. They had the logistics, the brand, the catalog experience, and the customer relationships. Amazon built all of that from scratch — because Sears refused to see that their catalog business was the precursor to e-commerce, not a separate business.
💡

Key Takeaway

Incumbents fail when they define themselves by their current form rather than their fundamental capability. Sears was a "fulfillment company" trapped in a "department store" identity. Use Wardley Mapping to see where your market is heading and evolve before it's too late.

Tools Used in This Story

Related Combos

Sources